[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1daff001-4769-4aeb-83a6-dafbe84fb39b@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:29:09 +0000
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>,
Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, willmcvicker@...gle.com, peter.griffin@...aro.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] dt-bindings: firmware: add google,gs101-acpm-ipc
On 2/11/25 12:05 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/02/2025 13:02, André Draszik wrote:
>> Hi Tudor,
>>
>> On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 11:57 +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>> And then I shall s/MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");/MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");/
>>> everywhere as "GPL" indicates [GNU Public License v2 or later].
>>
>> No, please don't, see Documentation/process/license-rules.rst.
Indeed, thanks, Andre'! The tag shouldn't convey the detailed license
information, as the only decision to be made is whether the module is
free software or not. I'll keep MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> For the rest of suggestions here I also recommend rereading docs. I
always a good suggestion :)
> don't get why we need to change "GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause", but maybe I
I reread the docs, LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 says that:
'''
For 'GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 only' use:
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
or
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
```
the two are equivalent. The downstream driver uses "GPL-2.0-only". I
think it'd be good that everything that I derived from it to have the
same SPDX value, for consistency reasons.
Thus I'll amend the license on the bindings file and on
include/linux/firmware/samsung/exynos-acpm-protocol.h only.
I'm not thrilled about a new version for such a small change, but I
think it's worth it.
Thanks,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists