[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUrg+gqJsg2LaBkzaLPzh4nZefqVdqH2rLhCEGQDya88g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:11:57 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Fix missing put_device
Hi Fabrizio,
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 19:20, Fabrizio Castro
<fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com> wrote:
> rzg2l_irqc_common_init calls of_find_device_by_node, but the
> corresponding put_device call is missing.
> This also gets reported by make coccicheck.
>
> Make use of the cleanup interfaces from cleanup.h to call into
> __free_put_device (which in turn calls into put_device) when
> leaving function rzg2l_irqc_common_init and variable "dev" goes
> out of scope.
>
> Mind that we don't want to "put" "dev" when rzg2l_irqc_common_init
> completes successfully, therefore assign NULL to "dev" to prevent
> __free_put_device from calling into put_device within the successful
> path.
>
> "make coccicheck" will still complain about missing put_device calls,
> but those are false positives now.
>
> Fixes: 3fed09559cd8 ("irqchip: Add RZ/G2L IA55 Interrupt Controller driver")
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>
Revisiting commit d038109ac1c6bf61 ("irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Fix missing
put_device")...
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> @@ -530,12 +531,12 @@ static int rzg2l_irqc_parse_interrupts(struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv,
> static int rzg2l_irqc_common_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent,
> const struct irq_chip *irq_chip)
> {
> + struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
> + struct device *dev __free(put_device) = pdev ? &pdev->dev : NULL;
Now there is a variable holding "&pdev->dev", all below references
to the latter can be replaced by "dev"...
> struct irq_domain *irq_domain, *parent_domain;
> - struct platform_device *pdev;
> struct reset_control *resetn;
> int ret;
>
> - pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
> if (!pdev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -591,6 +592,17 @@ static int rzg2l_irqc_common_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *
>
> register_syscore_ops(&rzg2l_irqc_syscore_ops);
>
> + /*
> + * Prevent the cleanup function from invoking put_device by assigning
> + * NULL to dev.
> + *
> + * make coccicheck will complain about missing put_device calls, but
> + * those are false positives, as dev will be automatically "put" via
> + * __free_put_device on the failing path.
> + * On the successful path we don't actually want to "put" dev.
> + */
> + dev = NULL;
> +
> return 0;
Can't the above be replaced by
no_free_ptr(dev);
? Or would Coccinelle still complain?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists