[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <116e9983-6c5f-45f3-a933-dcded223f6d7@icloud.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 23:29:02 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: Kurt Borja <kuurtb@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Maíra Canal
<mairacanal@...eup.net>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>, Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] driver core: add a faux bus for use when a simple
device/bus is needed
On 2025/2/10 22:29, Kurt Borja wrote:
>> +
>> + ret = device_add(dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("%s: device_add for faux device '%s' failed with %d\n",
>> + __func__, name, ret);
>> + put_device(dev);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
> Now that the probe is synchronous, what do you think about returning
> -ENODEV if the device failed to bind to the driver?
>
Result of device registering @ret is not, should not be, effected by
"device binding driver (probe result)"
if device binging driver failed, you may return -ENODEV in
faux_ops->probe(). not here.
> This would be useful for modules that may want to unload if the probe
> fails.
may need to root cause if probe failure happens.
how to unload module automatically if probe() failure ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists