linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: KVM: switch to kvm_lock/unlock_all

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250211000917.166856-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:09:17 -0500
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
	kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
	kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	x86@...nel.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
	Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@...wei.com>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: KVM: switch to kvm_lock/unlock_all_vcpus

use kvm_lock/unlock_all_vcpus instead of riscv's own
implementation.

Note that this does introduce a slight functional change - now vCPUs are
unlocked in the same order they were locked and not in the opposite order.

Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c | 36 +++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c
index 39cd26af5a69..32354e47c7d8 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c
@@ -12,36 +12,6 @@
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 
-static void unlock_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm, int vcpu_lock_idx)
-{
-	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp_vcpu;
-
-	for (; vcpu_lock_idx >= 0; vcpu_lock_idx--) {
-		tmp_vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_lock_idx);
-		mutex_unlock(&tmp_vcpu->mutex);
-	}
-}
-
-static void unlock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
-	unlock_vcpus(kvm, atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) - 1);
-}
-
-static bool lock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
-	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp_vcpu;
-	unsigned long c;
-
-	kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, tmp_vcpu, kvm) {
-		if (!mutex_trylock(&tmp_vcpu->mutex)) {
-			unlock_vcpus(kvm, c - 1);
-			return false;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return true;
-}
-
 static int aia_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -52,8 +22,8 @@ static int aia_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
 	if (irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
 		return -EEXIST;
 
-	ret = -EBUSY;
-	if (!lock_all_vcpus(kvm))
+	ret = kvm_lock_all_vcpus(kvm);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
@@ -65,7 +35,7 @@ static int aia_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
 	kvm->arch.aia.in_kernel = true;
 
 out_unlock:
-	unlock_all_vcpus(kvm);
+	kvm_unlock_all_vcpus(kvm);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.26.3