[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250211163720.GH3754072@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 12:37:20 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@...cle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, James Gowans <jgowans@...zon.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@...zon.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/14] kexec: Add Kexec HandOver (KHO) generation
helpers
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:14:06AM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> > think you should not add this when there are enough ideas on how to
> > completely avoid it.
>
> Thinking about it some more, I'm actually leaning towards keeping
> things as they are, instead of going with a sparse FDT.
What is a sparse FDT? My suggestion each driver make its own FDT?
The reason for this was sequencing because we need a more more
flexable way to manage all this serialization than just a notifier
chain. The existing FDT construction process is too restrictive to
accommodate this, IMHO.
That it also resolves the weird dt_max stuff above is a nice side
effect.
> With a sparse KHO-tree, we'd be kinda trying to fix something that
> should be handled higher up. All userspace preservable memory (like
> emulated pmem with devdax/fsdax and also pstore for logging) can
> already survive cold reboots with modified firmware Google and
> Microsoft do this.
I was hoping the VM memory wouldn't be in DAX. If you want some DAX
stuff to interact with FW, OK, but I think the design here should be
driving toward preserving a memfd/guestmemfd/hugetlbfs FDs directly
and eliminate the DAX backed VMs. We won't get to CC guestmemfd with
DAX.
fdbox of a guestmemfd, for instance.
To do that you need to preserve folios as the basic primitive.
> Similarly, the firmware could give the kernel the KHO-tree (generated
> by firmware or from the previous kernel) to keep stuff like telemetry,
> oops messages, time stamps etc.
This feels like a mistake to comingle things like this. KHO is complex
enough, it should stay focused on its thing..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists