[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b56f0ef79708c66adf8971b78d631eb5f318e48c.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:23:19 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
nadav.amit@...il.com, thomas.lendacky@....com, kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jannh@...gle.com,
mhklinux@...look.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, Manali Shukla
<Manali.Shukla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/12] x86/mm: make MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
unconditional
On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 13:10 +0100, Brendan Jackman wrote:
>
> Maybe I can send a separate patch to note this in the commentary,
> it's
> interesting and useful to know.
>
I added a similar comment to this patch series
for v10 yesterday. I'll send it out after a few
more tests have finished running.
I'm not particularly invested in which version
of the comment gets merged :)
--
All Rights Reversed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists