[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9ko_cGmOT3=kkcS3RAJ5pB1dAFR2GfXoE+C7c_k_8_3GA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:56:38 -0500
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
DJ Delorie <dj@...hat.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>, Will Newton <will.newton@...aro.org>,
Paul Eggert <eggert@...ucla.edu>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] rust: alloc: satisfy POSIX alignment requirement
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 4:54 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Agree with Miguel, better to drop it in such cases.
>
> But no worries, Tamir. It was still valid in this case, which is why I did not
> complain. :)
>
> Also feel free to keep it for v5, moving to Gary's simplification.
>
> - Danilo
🫡
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists