[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250211142144.30e5fa62@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:21:44 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu
Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Neal Cardwell
<ncardwell@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] trace: tcp: Add tracepoint for
tcp_cwnd_reduction()
On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 10:03:53 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote:
> +DECLARE_TRACE(tcp_cwnd_reduction_tp,
> + TP_PROTO(const struct sock *sk, int newly_acked_sacked,
> + int newly_lost, int flag),
> + TP_ARGS(sk, newly_acked_sacked, newly_lost, flag));
nit: I think that the ");" traditionally goes on a separate line?
regarding testing if the goal is the use in BPF perhaps you could
add a small sample/result to the commit message of using bpftrace
against it?
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists