[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6sAhAM4mGZCDBU-@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:47:16 +0100
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] clk: imx: clk-fracn-gppll: Support dynamic rates
Hi Alexander,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 05:00:11PM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> The fracn gppll PLL so far only supports rates from a rate table passed
> during initialization. Calculating PLL settings dynamically helps audio
> applications to get their desired rates, so support for this is added
> in this patch.
>
> The strategy to get to the PLL setting for a rate is:
>
> - The rate table is searched for suitable rates, so for standard rates the
> same settings are used as without this patch
> - Then try to only adjust mfn, on fractional PLLs only, which specifies
> the fractional part of the PLL. This setting can be changed without
> glitches on the output and is therefore preferred
I wonder if this part is worth it. There might be cases in which a
glitch free switch is required, but without being able to enforce
a glitch free switch we can't rely on it.
Also this makes the result depend on the current PLL settings, so the
result is no longer reproducible. I.e. switching from a fari away
frequency to the desired frequency might yield in different settings
than switching from a nearby frequency to the desired frequency.
Finally I think the glitch free switch doesn't work currently, because
the PLL is fully disabled and re-enabled unconditionally in
clk_fracn_gppll_set_rate().
That said, glitch free switching would be great to have sometimes.
> - As a last resort the best settings are calculated dynamically
>
> Implementation is inspired by commit b09c68dc57c9d ("clk: imx: pll14xx:
> Support dynamic rates")
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
> ---
...
> + if (pll->flags & CLK_FRACN_GPPLL_FRACN) {
> + if (!dist) {
> + /* Disable fractional part upon exact match */
> + mfd = 1;
> + mfn = 0;
> + } else {
> + mfd = 100;
> + mfd = clamp(mfd, PLL_MFD_MIN, PLL_MFN_MAX);
With mfd = 100 this clamp looks like a no-op. Do we need this?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists