lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250211-therapeutic-futuristic-parakeet-204cae@krzk-bin>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:14:05 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com
Cc: lee@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, 
	conor+dt@...nel.org, claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, sre@...nel.org, 
	nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, 
	linux@...linux.org.uk, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: add
 microchip,sama7d65-sfrbu

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:13:02PM -0700, Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com wrote:
> From: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com>
> 
> Add SAMA7D65 SFRBU compatible string to DT bindings documentation
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
> index 51d896c88dafa..727292ffe092e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ select:
>            - microchip,mpfs-sysreg-scb
>            - microchip,sam9x60-sfr
>            - microchip,sama7d65-ddr3phy
> +          - microchip,sama7d65-sfrbu

You got comment on #1 of your v1, so if you make exactly the same
mistake in other patches then fix it there as well.

Apply v1 Rob's comments to all your patches.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ