linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 5/9] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add ad485x axi variant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250211-industrious-rugged-gecko-9b5c02@krzk-bin>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:16:31 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>, robh@...nel.org, 
	conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 5/9] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add ad485x axi variant

On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 04:20:58PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:09:14 +0200
> Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com> wrote:
> 
> > Add a new compatible and related bindings for the fpga-based
> > AD485x AXI IP core, a variant of the generic AXI ADC IP.
> > 
> > The AXI AD485x IP is a very similar HDL (fpga) variant of the
> > generic AXI ADC IP, intended to control ad485x familiy.
> 
> Hmm. Should we name this after a specific part? Very unlikely
> the wildcard will go wrong here because of how specific this
> binding is anyway but we should perhaps stick to normal rules
> of no wild cards.

I am pretty sure we had this discussion about this or other block
already and we reached some sort of concensus... which is undocumented
in commit msg, so we are doomed to repeat the discussion.

Best regards,
Krzysztof