lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202502111626.K7CTghCR-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:07:13 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: scripts/sorttable: Implement sorting mcount_loc
 at boot for arm64

Hi Steven,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v6.14-rc2 next-20250210]
[cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core arm-perf/for-next/perf kvmarm/next soc/for-next arm/for-next arm/fixes]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/arm64-scripts-sorttable-Implement-sorting-mcount_loc-at-boot-for-arm64/20250211-032956
base:   linus/master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210142647.083ff456%40gandalf.local.home
patch subject: [PATCH] arm64: scripts/sorttable: Implement sorting mcount_loc at boot for arm64
config: riscv-randconfig-001-20250211 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250211/202502111626.K7CTghCR-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250211/202502111626.K7CTghCR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502111626.K7CTghCR-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> scripts/sorttable.c:306:13: warning: 'rela_write_addend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
     306 | static void rela_write_addend(Elf_Rela *rela, uint64_t val)
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> scripts/sorttable.c:287:17: warning: 'rela_addend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
     287 | static uint64_t rela_##fn_name(Elf_Rela *rela)          \
         |                 ^~~~~
   scripts/sorttable.c:294:1: note: in expansion of macro 'RELA_ADDR'
     294 | RELA_ADDR(addend)
         | ^~~~~~~~~
>> scripts/sorttable.c:287:17: warning: 'rela_info' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
     287 | static uint64_t rela_##fn_name(Elf_Rela *rela)          \
         |                 ^~~~~
   scripts/sorttable.c:293:1: note: in expansion of macro 'RELA_ADDR'
     293 | RELA_ADDR(info)
         | ^~~~~~~~~
>> scripts/sorttable.c:287:17: warning: 'rela_offset' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
     287 | static uint64_t rela_##fn_name(Elf_Rela *rela)          \
         |                 ^~~~~
   scripts/sorttable.c:292:1: note: in expansion of macro 'RELA_ADDR'
     292 | RELA_ADDR(offset)
         | ^~~~~~~~~
   In file included from arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
   include/linux/ftrace.h: In function 'ftrace_get_regs':
   include/linux/ftrace.h:190:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_ftrace_get_regs'; did you mean 'arch_ftrace_regs'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     190 |         return arch_ftrace_get_regs(fregs);
         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                arch_ftrace_regs
   include/linux/ftrace.h:190:16: error: returning 'int' from a function with return type 'struct pt_regs *' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
     190 |         return arch_ftrace_get_regs(fregs);
         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:102: arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1 shuffle=1925395641
   make[3]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make[2]: *** [Makefile:1264: prepare0] Error 2 shuffle=1925395641
   make[2]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [Makefile:251: __sub-make] Error 2 shuffle=1925395641
   make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:251: __sub-make] Error 2 shuffle=1925395641
   make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.


vim +/rela_write_addend +306 scripts/sorttable.c

   275	
   276	#define RELA_ADDR(fn_name)				\
   277	static uint64_t rela64_##fn_name(Elf_Rela *rela)	\
   278	{							\
   279		return r8((uint64_t *)&rela->e64.r_##fn_name);	\
   280	}							\
   281								\
   282	static uint64_t rela32_##fn_name(Elf_Rela *rela)	\
   283	{							\
   284		return r((uint32_t *)&rela->e32.r_##fn_name);	\
   285	}							\
   286								\
 > 287	static uint64_t rela_##fn_name(Elf_Rela *rela)		\
   288	{							\
   289		return e.rela_##fn_name(rela);			\
   290	}
   291	
   292	RELA_ADDR(offset)
   293	RELA_ADDR(info)
   294	RELA_ADDR(addend)
   295	
   296	static void rela64_write_addend(Elf_Rela *rela, uint64_t val)
   297	{
   298		w8(val, (uint64_t *)&rela->e64.r_addend);
   299	}
   300	
   301	static void rela32_write_addend(Elf_Rela *rela, uint64_t val)
   302	{
   303		w(val, (uint32_t *)&rela->e32.r_addend);
   304	}
   305	
 > 306	static void rela_write_addend(Elf_Rela *rela, uint64_t val)
   307	{
   308		e.rela_write_addend(rela, val);
   309	}
   310	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ