[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6sahFdh9uVhrRhA@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:38:12 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] rv: Add scheduler specification monitors
On 10/02/25 13:56, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-02-07 at 15:27 +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >
> > Right. I guess I wonder if we can find a way to inject kernel
> > problems
> > somehow, so that model(s) can be further tested explicitly thus
> > making
> > us confident that they will be able to identify real problems when
> > they
> > occur.
> >
>
> I sketched it quickly and I wouldn't include it in this series not to
> make it heavier, but if you want to play with it I wrote a patch
> exporting a function to inject events and building a kernel module
> calling the function periodically.
Ah, this is cool. Thanks for working on it!
Yeah, agree, we can leave it for later.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists