[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6sljm1lurDKPCvj@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:25:18 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Ondrej Kozina <okozina@...hat.com>,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>,
Thomas Staudt <tstaudt@...ibm.com>,
Daniel P . Berrangé <berrange@...hat.com>,
Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>, Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Support kdump with LUKS encryption by reusing
LUKS volume keys
On 02/07/25 at 04:08pm, Coiby Xu wrote:
> LUKS is the standard for Linux disk encryption, widely adopted by users,
> and in some cases, such as Confidential VMs, it is a requirement. With
> kdump enabled, when the first kernel crashes, the system can boot into
> the kdump/crash kernel to dump the memory image (i.e., /proc/vmcore)
> to a specified target. However, there are two challenges when dumping
> vmcore to a LUKS-encrypted device:
>
> - Kdump kernel may not be able to decrypt the LUKS partition. For some
> machines, a system administrator may not have a chance to enter the
> password to decrypt the device in kdump initramfs after the 1st kernel
> crashes; For cloud confidential VMs, depending on the policy the
> kdump kernel may not be able to unseal the keys with TPM and the
> console virtual keyboard is untrusted.
>
> - LUKS2 by default use the memory-hard Argon2 key derivation function
> which is quite memory-consuming compared to the limited memory reserved
> for kdump. Take Fedora example, by default, only 256M is reserved for
> systems having memory between 4G-64G. With LUKS enabled, ~1300M needs
> to be reserved for kdump. Note if the memory reserved for kdump can't
> be used by 1st kernel i.e. an user sees ~1300M memory missing in the
> 1st kernel.
>
> Besides users (at least for Fedora) usually expect kdump to work out of
> the box i.e. no manual password input or custom crashkernel value is
> needed. And it doesn't make sense to derivate the keys again in kdump
> kernel which seems to be redundant work.
>
> This patch set addresses the above issues by making the LUKS volume keys
> persistent for kdump kernel with the help of cryptsetup's new APIs
> (--link-vk-to-keyring/--volume-key-keyring). Here is the life cycle of
> the kdump copies of LUKS volume keys,
>
> 1. After the 1st kernel loads the initramfs during boot, systemd
> use an user-input passphrase to de-crypt the LUKS volume keys
> or TPM-sealed key and then save the volume keys to specified keyring
> (using the --link-vk-to-keyring API) and the key will expire within
> specified time.
>
> 2. A user space tool (kdump initramfs loader like kdump-utils) create
> key items inside /sys/kernel/config/crash_dm_crypt_keys to inform
> the 1st kernel which keys are needed.
>
> 3. When the kdump initramfs is loaded by the kexec_file_load
> syscall, the 1st kernel will iterate created key items, save the
> keys to kdump reserved memory.
>
> 4. When the 1st kernel crashes and the kdump initramfs is booted, the
> kdump initramfs asks the kdump kernel to create a user key using the
> key stored in kdump reserved memory by writing yes to
> /sys/kernel/crash_dm_crypt_keys/restore. Then the LUKS encrypted
> device is unlocked with libcryptsetup's --volume-key-keyring API.
>
> 5. The system gets rebooted to the 1st kernel after dumping vmcore to
> the LUKS encrypted device is finished
>
> After libcryptsetup saving the LUKS volume keys to specified keyring,
> whoever takes this should be responsible for the safety of these copies
> of keys. The keys will be saved in the memory area exclusively reserved
> for kdump where even the 1st kernel has no direct access. And further
> more, two additional protections are added,
> - save the copy randomly in kdump reserved memory as suggested by Jan
> - clear the _PAGE_PRESENT flag of the page that stores the copy as
> suggested by Pingfan
>
> This patch set only supports x86. There will be patches to support other
> architectures once this patch set gets merged.
This v8 looks good to me, thanks for the great effort, Coiby.
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists