[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <115b6e35d36f0ee9fbf46e5df0be7eaa928d78ad.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:25:04 +0000
From: Crystal Guo (郭晶) <Crystal.Guo@...iatek.com>
To: "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com"
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [v2,2/2] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: Add MediaTek DRAM
controller interface
On Sun, 2025-02-09 at 11:48 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>
>
> On 06/02/2025 13:16, Crystal Guo wrote:
> > A MediaTek DRAM controller interface to provide the current DDR
> > data rate.
>
> Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style /
> submission
> process (neither too early nor over the limit):
>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst*L597__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!lrJR1xYY1zrw1dRnvzwOsd0FyqQawTURFAKVFpWEaMLN2eiV03gQy8WDacH-ZGIypB4-WuPupcOERlw9$
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > .../mediatek,common-dramc.yaml | 129 --------------
> > ----
>
> Why is there removal here if you add? Commit msg explains nothing
> here.
>
> Why this patch was sent twice?
>
> Please use standard email subjects, so with the PATCH keyword in the
> title. `git format-patch -vX` helps here to create proper versioned
> patches. Another useful tool is b4. Skipping the PATCH keyword makes
> filtering of emails more difficult thus making the review process
> less
> convenient.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
This patch was based on the previous version.
But the approach was actually incorrect (shall NOT be patches on the
top of the previous version), so I have resent the new v2 patches based
on a clean kernel.
Thanks
Crystal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists