[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6zIl/6s2XfSvm71@hu-mojha-hyd.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 21:43:11 +0530
From: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@....qualcomm.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, konradybcio@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Saranya R <quic_sarar@...cinc.com>,
Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:59:36AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:37:35AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:37:11PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:43:23AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> > > > A Link tag to my report would be good to have as well if this fixes the
> > > > audio regression.
> > >
> > > I see this is somehow matching the logs you have reported, but this deadlock
> > > is there from the very first day of pdr_interface driver.
> > >
> > > [ 14.565059] PDR: avs/audio get domain list txn wait failed: -110
> > > [ 14.571943] PDR: service lookup for avs/audio failed: -110
> >
> > Yes, but using the in-kernel pd-mapper has exposed a number of existing
> > bugs since it changes the timing of events enough to make it easier to
> > hit them.
> >
> > The audio regression is a very real regression for users of Snapdragon
> > based laptops like, for example, the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x.
> >
> > If Bjorn has confirmed that this is the same issue (I can try to
> > instrument the code based on your analysis to confirm this too), then I
> > think it would be good to mention this in the commit message and link to
> > the report, for example:
> >
> > This specifically also fixes an audio regression when using the
> > in-kernel pd-mapper as that makes it easier to hit this race. [1]
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zqet8iInnDhnxkT9@hovoldconsulting.com/ # [1]
> >
> > or similar.
>
> I can confirm that audio regression with the in-kernel pd-mapper appears
> to be caused by the race that this patch fixes.
>
> If I insert a short (100-200 ms) sleep before taking the list lock in
> pdr_locator_new_server() to increase the race window, I see the audio
> service failing to register on both the X1E CRD and Lenovo ThinkPad
> X13s:
>
> [ 11.118557] pdr_add_lookup - tms/servreg / msm/adsp/charger_pd
> [ 11.443632] pdr_locator_new_server
> [ 11.558122] pdr_locator_new_server - taking list lock
> [ 11.563939] pdr_locator_new_server - releasing list lock
> [ 11.582178] pdr_locator_work - taking list lock
> [ 11.594468] pdr_locator_work - releasing list lock
> [ 11.992018] pdr_add_lookup - avs/audio / msm/adsp/audio_pd
> [ 11.992034] pdr_add_lookup - avs/audio / msm/adsp/audio_pd
> [ 11.992224] pdr_locator_new_server
> < 100 ms sleep inserted before taking lock in pdr_locator_new_server() >
> [ 11.997937] pdr_locator_work - taking list lock
> [ 12.093984] pdr_locator_new_server - taking list lock
> [ 17.120169] PDR: avs/audio get domain list txn wait failed: -110
> [ 17.127066] PDR: service lookup for avs/audio failed: -110
> [ 17.132893] pdr_locator_work - releasing list lock
> [ 17.139885] pdr_locator_new_server - releasing list lock
>
> [ On the X13s, where I have not hit this issue with the in-kernel
> pd-mapper, I had to make sure to insert the sleep only on the second
> call, possibly because of interaction with the charger_pd registration
> which happened closer to the audio registration. ]
>
> Please add a comment and link to the audio regression report as I
> suggested above, and feel free to include my:
>
> Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
>
> Thanks for fixing this!
Thanks for putting extra effort in reproducing the issue and testing.
-Mukesh
>
> Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists