[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6zX3Ro60sMH7C13@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:18:21 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
Guohanjun <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 5/5] arm64: introduce copy_mc_to_kernel()
implementation
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 10:42:57AM +0800, Tong Tiangen wrote:
> The copy_mc_to_kernel() helper is memory copy implementation that handles
> source exceptions. It can be used in memory copy scenarios that tolerate
> hardware memory errors(e.g: pmem_read/dax_copy_to_iter).
>
> Currently, only x86 and ppc support this helper, Add this for ARM64 as
> well, if ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC is defined, by implementing copy_mc_to_kernel()
> and memcpy_mc() functions.
>
> Because there is no caller-saved GPR is available for saving "bytes not
> copied" in memcpy(), the memcpy_mc() is referenced to the implementation
> of copy_from_user(). In addition, the fixup of MOPS insn is not considered
> at present.
Same question as on the previous patch, can we not avoid the memcpy()
duplication if the only difference is entries in the exception table?
IIUC in patch 2 fixup_exception() even ignores the new type. The error
must come on the do_sea() path.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists