[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6zZ_UqcY9MbyDL1@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 12:27:25 -0500
From: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
To: "Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo" <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
Cc: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>, hyeonggon.yoo@...com,
ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com, rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
honggyu.kim@...com, rakie.kim@...com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
horen.chuang@...ux.dev, hannes@...xchg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 11:30:01AM -0500, Gregory Price wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> > > index 80a3481c0470..cc94cba112dd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/list_sort.h>
> > > #include <linux/memregion.h>
> > > #include <linux/memory.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
> >
> > nit: is this #include directive necessary?
>
> yes because hmat.c now calls
> mempolicy_set_node_perf(nid, coord))
>
apologies, i missed that there were two of these, we'll drop this.
~Gregory
Powered by blists - more mailing lists