[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9915fb7-ad8c-40ff-b53a-fb6936c141b1@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 14:17:33 -0500
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tests: Fix Tool PMU test segfault
On 2025-02-12 11:38 a.m., James Clark wrote:
> tool_pmu__event_to_str() now handles skipped events by returning NULL,
> so it's wrong to re-check for a skip on the resulting string. Calling
> tool_pmu__skip_event() with a NULL string results in a segfault so
> remove the unnecessary skip to fix it:
>
> $ perf test -vv "parsing with PMU name"
>
> 12.2: Parsing with PMU name:
> ...
> ---- unexpected signal (11) ----
> 12.2: Parsing with PMU name : FAILED!
>
Oops, right. Thanks for the fix.
Acked-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Kan
> Fixes: ee8aef2d2321 ("perf tools: Add skip check in tool_pmu__event_to_str()")
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
> ---> tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c b/tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c
> index 187942b749b7..1e900ef92e37 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static int do_test(enum tool_pmu_event ev, bool with_pmu)
> parse_events_error__init(&err);
> ret = parse_events(evlist, str, &err);
> if (ret) {
> - if (tool_pmu__skip_event(tool_pmu__event_to_str(ev))) {
> + if (!tool_pmu__event_to_str(ev)) {
> ret = TEST_OK;
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static int do_test(enum tool_pmu_event ev, bool with_pmu)
> }
> }
>
> - if (!found && !tool_pmu__skip_event(tool_pmu__event_to_str(ev))) {
> + if (!found && tool_pmu__event_to_str(ev)) {
> pr_debug("FAILED %s:%d Didn't find tool event '%s' in parsed evsels\n",
> __FILE__, __LINE__, str);
> ret = TEST_FAIL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists