[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37954fc4-27cc-4e5f-a8ef-0e7f4ac0e041@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 01:19:38 +0530
From: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] i3c: master: Add Qualcomm I3C master controller
driver
On 2/13/2025 1:09 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/02/2025 20:29, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
>> Thanks a lot Rob ! sorry, i was late to respond on this while waiting
>> for other comments agreements.
>>
>> On 2/12/2025 3:11 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 09:41:28PM +0530, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
>>>> Thanks Krzysztof !
>>>>
>>>> On 2/9/2025 5:10 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 07/02/2025 13:03, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
>>>>>>>> + gi3c->se.clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "se-clk");
>>>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(gi3c->se.clk)) {
>>>>>>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(gi3c->se.clk);
>>>>>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error getting SE Core clk %d\n", ret);
>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "se-clock-frequency", &gi3c->clk_src_freq);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You never tested your DTS or this code... Drop
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have tested on SM8550 MTP only. Below entry in my internal/local DTSI.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And how is it supposed to work? Are you going to send us your local
>>>>> internal DTSI? Is it going to pass any checks?
>>>> was saying about code was testing with MTP. DTS was tested using dt-bindings
>>>> check.
>>>
>>> make dtbs_check is how you test.
>> Sure, we are running "make dt_binding_check
>> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qcom,i3c-master.yaml"
>
> Hm? Please read it again. You anyway have it documented in your company
> guidebook, so I expect you follow that one *very* carefully because
> reviewers repeating the same as your company book and then repeating
> themselves three times is just too much.
>
sorry, i will run what Rob has pointed "make dtbs_check" as it's giving
me exact clarity what to do. I just mentioned what i was doing.
And as you pointed, will follow complete internal guide too if it's
missing dtbs check. Thanks !
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists