linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/mediatek/hdmi: Simplify with dev_err

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7341db6b-aed0-4da0-a5b2-6992d86ffaf3@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 21:33:20 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
 Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/mediatek/hdmi: Simplify with dev_err_probe

On 13/01/2025 14:48, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 13/01/25 14:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
>> On 13/01/2025 13:41, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>> Il 12/01/25 14:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
>>>> Use dev_err_probe() to make error code and deferred probe handling
>>>> simpler.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's already done in [1] so you can drop this commit.
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250108112744.64686-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com
>>>
>> Eh, this was first in v3 in the middle of Dec, so why you cannot get it
>> merged first? Creating such 34-behemoths causes simple cleanups to
>> unnecessarily wait.
>>
> 
> Getting the series partially merged is okay for me, no complaints about that,
> but then ... in v4, there are two minor comments to address (one of which
> is a one-char nitpick!) that might as well be done while applying, depending
> on what CK thinks about that, so there's no real benefit in getting 28 commits
> out of 34 picked instead of, well, just everything...
> 

OK, month passed, I waited, so is your big patchset merged? If it is,
then this will effectively rebase my patch, as you requested.

Best regards,
Krzysztof