[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250212204546.3751645-2-csander@purestorage.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:45:45 -0700
From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc: Riley Thomasson <riley@...estorage.com>,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring/uring_cmd: don't assume io_uring_cmd_data layout
eaf72f7b414f ("io_uring/uring_cmd: cleanup struct io_uring_cmd_data
layout") removed most of the places assuming struct io_uring_cmd_data
has sqes as its first field. However, the EAGAIN case in io_uring_cmd()
still compares ioucmd->sqe to the struct io_uring_cmd_data pointer using
a void * cast. Since fa3595523d72 ("io_uring: get rid of alloc cache
init_once handling"), sqes is no longer io_uring_cmd_data's first field.
As a result, the pointers will always compare unequal and memcpy() may
be called with the same source and destination.
Replace the incorrect void * cast with the address of the sqes field.
Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Fixes: eaf72f7b414f ("io_uring/uring_cmd: cleanup struct io_uring_cmd_data layout")
---
io_uring/uring_cmd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
index 1f6a82128b47..cfb22e1de0e7 100644
--- a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
+++ b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
@@ -250,11 +250,11 @@ int io_uring_cmd(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
ret = file->f_op->uring_cmd(ioucmd, issue_flags);
if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
struct io_uring_cmd_data *cache = req->async_data;
- if (ioucmd->sqe != (void *) cache)
+ if (ioucmd->sqe != cache->sqes)
memcpy(cache->sqes, ioucmd->sqe, uring_sqe_size(req->ctx));
return -EAGAIN;
} else if (ret == -EIOCBQUEUED) {
return -EIOCBQUEUED;
}
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists