[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2038149484.28376811.1739400158648.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 23:42:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the uml-fixes
tree
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Hi all,
>
> Commits
>
> fb4cc5f19d36 ("um: convert irq_lock to raw spinlock")
> 4e9b8ce9f58f ("um: virtio_uml: use raw spinlock")
> cafe54dc8e56 ("um: virt-pci: don't use kmalloc()")
> acc4521e845b ("um: fix execve stub execution on old host OSs")
> 02fef369f75a ("um: properly align signal stack on x86_64")
> cfaa0ff6e035 ("um: avoid copying FP state from init_task")
> 05c322fb75a4 ("um: add back support for FXSAVE registers")
>
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
>
> They appear to have all been rebased but not had SOB's for the new
> commiter added.
That was fast. :D
The branch was prepared by Johannes before the merge window and now
I have rebased it to v6.14-rc2.
So, I'll add my SOB too, ok?
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists