[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8899161a-573d-4826-a6f8-88c2dd145692@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:31:19 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: jeffxu@...omium.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
jannh@...gle.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org, oleg@...hat.com, avagin@...il.com,
benjamin@...solutions.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, jorgelo@...omium.org, sroettger@...gle.com, hch@....de,
ojeda@...nel.org, thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de, adobriyan@...il.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, pedro.falcato@...il.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
willy@...radead.org, anna-maria@...utronix.de, mark.rutland@....com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, Jason@...c4.com, deller@....de,
davem@...emloft.net, peterx@...hat.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
gerg@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...nel.org,
ardb@...nel.org, mhocko@...e.com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org,
ardb@...gle.com, enh@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, groeck@...omium.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com,
mike.rapoport@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/7] mseal, system mappings: kernel config and
header change
On 2/11/25 7:21 PM, jeffxu@...omium.org wrote:
> From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
>
> ---
> include/linux/userprocess.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> init/Kconfig | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> security/Kconfig | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/userprocess.h
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index d0d021b3fa3b..892d2bcdf397 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1882,6 +1882,24 @@ config ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_CALLBACKS
> config ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE
> bool
>
> +config ARCH_HAS_MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS
> + bool
> + help
> + Control MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS access based on architecture.
> +
> + A 64-bit kernel is required for the memory sealing feature.
> + No specific hardware features from the CPU are needed.
> +
> + To enable this feature, the architecture needs to update their
> + speical mappings calls to include the sealing flag and confirm
special
> + that it doesn't unmap/remap system mappings during the life
> + time of the process. After the architecture enables this, a
> + distribution can set CONFIG_MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPING to manage access
> + to the feature.
> +
> + For complete descriptions of memory sealing, please see
> + Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst
> +
> config HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
> bool
> help
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists