[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <173933522466.22054.10492497527270412453@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:40:24 +1100
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To: "Al Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@...nel.org>, "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>,
"Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
"Trond Myklebust" <trondmy@...nel.org>, "Anna Schumaker" <anna@...nel.org>,
"Namjae Jeon" <linkinjeon@...nel.org>, "Steve French" <sfrench@...ba.org>,
"Sergey Senozhatsky" <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
"Tom Talpey" <tom@...pey.com>, "Paul Moore" <paul@...l-moore.com>,
"Eric Paris" <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, audit@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 2/2] VFS: add common error checks to lookup_one_qstr_excl()
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 02:45:04PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Feb 2025, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > I do see some value in the simplicity of this approach, though maybe not
> > as much value as you see. But the above uses inode_lock_share(), rather
> > than the nested version, so lockdep will complain.
>
> IDGI... It doesn't grab any ->i_rwsem inside that one, so what's there to
> complain about? And in that case it returns with no locks held, so...
>
Sorry - my bad. I saw the difference in nesting and jumped the wrong
way.
NeilBrown
Powered by blists - more mailing lists