linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/5] dt-bindings: thermal: Add MBG thermal monitor support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a61e73d-29d1-4189-89eb-1299b8934af9@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 07:06:56 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
 Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
 Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...il.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Ajit Pandey
 <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>, Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
 Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
 quic_kamalw@...cinc.com, quic_jprakash@...cinc.com,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/5] dt-bindings: thermal: Add MBG thermal monitor
 support

On 12/02/2025 00:57, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:50:12PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 11/02/2025 12:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 11/02/2025 12:15, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/13/2024 2:08 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 09:41:20PM +0530, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +required:
>>>>>> +  - compatible
>>>>>> +  - reg
>>>>>> +  - interrupts
>>>>>> +  - io-channels
>>>>>> +  - io-channel-names
>>>>> Binding looks ok, but this wasn't tested due to unneeded dependency.
>>>>> Please decouple from dependency, so automation can properly test it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The dependency is needed because this mbg peripheral is present on only 
>>>> targets which have GEN3 ADC5, for which the bindings support is added in 
>>>> the series [1]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] 
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/c4ca0a4c-e421-4cf6-b073-8e9019400f4c@quicinc.com/
>>>
>>> Sure. Then this cannot be merged due to resulting test failure.
>>>
>>> Please don't post new versions before this can be actually tested and
>>> applied.
>>
>> Heh, you responded *after two months*, to an old email so even previous
>> discussion is gone from my inbox.
> 
> Are you responding to your own email?

Look at the timeline of these emails. Satya responded after two months
with some comment. I responded now. Then I noticed that it is talk about
something two months old, so I responded again. Two responses from me,
that's correct.

I recently got way too many such 2-month old clarifications.

That's indeed right of the contributor to respond in their own pace, I
am also sometimes slow, but really there should be some limit. It's
putting unnecessary burden on reviewers as now I should dig some old
discussion.
Best regards,
Krzysztof