linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V8 04/14] rust: Add cpumask helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250212073438.bjhfgefz7t4dxobi@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:04:38 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
	Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@...aro.org>,
	Erik Schilling <erik.schilling@...aro.org>,
	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
	Joakim Bech <joakim.bech@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 04/14] rust: Add cpumask helpers

On 11-02-25, 11:24, Yury Norov wrote:
> To begin with, this is the 8th version of the same patch, but you
> only now bothered to CC someone who is listed in MAINTAINERS. This is
> not how the community works.

Yes, this was my mistake. I assumed get_maintainers would Cc all
relevant people, but I overlooked the fact that these are new files,
so it didn’t include the maintainers. Unfortunately, the same issue
occurred with the clk bindings. Miguel pointed it out at V7, and I
corrected it immediately. There was no intention to bypass anyone.

These bindings had been in my tree since earlier versions, but I
hesitated to post them before V6 because I wasn’t confident in writing
bindings for a framework I didn’t fully understand. I eventually
shared them in V6 to unblock my series but inadvertently missed Cc’ing
few, as mentioned above.

> You also made it a patch bomb that touches multiple critical and very
> sensitive subsystems. You link them to an experimental and unstable
> project, and do it in a way that makes it really easy to slip through
> maintainers' attention.
> 
> Not speaking for others, but please for cpumasks create a separate
> series and start thorough discussion.

Agree, its better to post these separately.

-- 
viresh