lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_A7CAD02BDAA81222B6C184105ED6F9258706@qq.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:14:14 +0800
From: Rong Tao <rtoax@...mail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
 Quentin Monnet <qmo@...nel.org>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, rongtao@...tc.cn,
 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau
 <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
 Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
 "open list:BPF [TOOLING] (bpftool)" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
 open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpftool: Check map name length when map
 create


On 2/12/25 05:07, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 2:48 AM Quentin Monnet <qmo@...nel.org> wrote:
>> 2025-02-11 18:38 UTC+0800 ~ Rong Tao <rtoax@...mail.com>
>>> From: Rong Tao <rongtao@...tc.cn>
>>>
>>> The size of struct bpf_map::name is BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN (16).
>>>
>>> bpf(2) {
>>>    map_create() {
>>>      bpf_obj_name_cpy(map->name, attr->map_name, sizeof(attr->map_name));
>>>    }
>>> }
>>>
>>> When specifying a map name using bpftool map create name, no error is
>>> reported if the name length is greater than 15.
>>>
>>>      $ sudo bpftool map create /sys/fs/bpf/12345678901234567890 \
>>>          type array key 4 value 4 entries 5 name 12345678901234567890
>>>
>>> Users will think that 12345678901234567890 is legal, but this name cannot
>>> be used to index a map.
>>>
>>>      $ sudo bpftool map show name 12345678901234567890
>>>      Error: can't parse name
>>>
>>>      $ sudo bpftool map show
>>>      ...
>>>      1249: array  name 123456789012345  flags 0x0
>>>        key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 5  memlock 304B
>>>
>>>      $ sudo bpftool map show name 123456789012345
>>>      1249: array  name 123456789012345  flags 0x0
>>>        key 4B  value 4B  max_entries 5  memlock 304B
>>>
>>> The map name provided in the command line is truncated, but no error is
>>> reported. This submission checks the length of the map name.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@...tc.cn>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@...nel.org>
>>
> Would it make sense to just warn but proceed with a truncated name?
> libbpf truncates the name when creating a map, but preserves the
> original name in BTF (and in memory, fetchable through
> bpf_map__name()). So from the user's perspective that map is still
> named "blah-blah-something-long", even if the kernel records just a
> prefix of that.
>
> Basically, instead of forcing users to count the first 15 characters,
> warn, but do the right thing anyways?

Yes, you're right, i'll submit v3.

Rong Tao

>
>> Thank you!


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ