linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] s390/pci: store DMA offset in bus_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <befb6c9bf710c61836339b2d2f744967db00780b.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:02:04 +0100
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
        robin.murphy@....com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        svens@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, farman@...ux.ibm.com,
        clegoate@...hat.com, jgg@...dia.com, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] s390/pci: store DMA offset in bus_dma_region

On Wed, 2025-02-12 at 16:34 -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> PCI devices on s390 have a DMA offset that is reported via CLP.  In
> preparation for allowing identity domains, setup the bus_dma_region
> for all PCI devices using the reported CLP value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c
> index 857afbc4828f..3fa113c4ad8f 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <linux/jump_label.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/printk.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-direct.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/pci_clp.h>
>  #include <asm/pci_dma.h>
> @@ -283,10 +284,34 @@ static struct zpci_bus *zpci_bus_alloc(int topo, bool topo_is_tid)
>  	return zbus;
>  }
>  
> +static void pci_dma_range_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci(pdev);
> +	struct bus_dma_region *map;
> +	u64 aligned_end;
> +
> +	map = kzalloc(sizeof(*map), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!map)
> +		return;
> +
> +	map->cpu_start = 0;
> +	map->dma_start = PAGE_ALIGN(zdev->start_dma);
> +	aligned_end = PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(zdev->end_dma + 1);
> +	if (aligned_end >= map->dma_start)
> +		map->size = aligned_end - map->dma_start;
> +	else
> +		map->size = 0;
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(map->size == 0);
> +
> +	pdev->dev.dma_range_map = map;
> +}
> +
>  void pcibios_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci(pdev);
>  
> +	pci_dma_range_setup(pdev);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * With pdev->no_vf_scan the common PCI probing code does not
>  	 * perform PF/VF linking.

Looks good to me and I tested it again. So feel free to add my:

Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>