[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250213025108.svqgj5nzseqs6qox@jpoimboe>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:51:08 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Add jump table support for objtool on LoongArch
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 03:22:45PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > The new series now has 7 patches:
> >
> > Tiezhu Yang (7):
> > objtool: Handle various symbol types of rodata
> > objtool: Handle different entry size of rodata
> > objtool: Handle PC relative relocation type
> > objtool/LoongArch: Add support for switch table
> > objtool/LoongArch: Add support for goto table
> > LoongArch: Enable jump table for objtool
> > LoongArch: Convert unreachable() to BUG()
> >
> > I was planning on queueing all 7.
> >
> > In particular, patch 6 should stay with the objtool patches since
> > they're directly related.
> >
> > But I was also just going to grab 7 as well.
> >
> > Please let me know if you disagree.
> What about you merge the first 5 patches, and then I merge the last 2
> to the loongarch tree? (I prefer to merge the whole series to the
> loongarch tree with your acked-by, but that may be inconvenient to
> you).
I want the first 5 patches to go through the -tip tree because we'll
have other patches depending on them.
I'll go ahead and take the first 5.
If you take in patches 6 & 7 separately, that might introduce a lot of
warnings. But it's up to you.
For patches 6 & 7:
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists