[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250213170316.GG235556@e132581.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:03:16 +0000
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 10/11] KVM: arm64: nvhe: Disable branch generation in
nVHE guests
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 06:43:04PM -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
[...]
> +static void __debug_save_brbe(u64 *brbcr_el1)
> +{
> + *brbcr_el1 = 0;
> +
> + /* Check if the BRBE is enabled */
> + if (!(read_sysreg_el1(SYS_BRBCR) & (BRBCR_ELx_E0BRE | BRBCR_ELx_ExBRE)))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * Prohibit branch record generation while we are in guest.
> + * Since access to BRBCR_EL1 is trapped, the guest can't
> + * modify the filtering set by the host.
> + */
> + *brbcr_el1 = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_BRBCR);
> + write_sysreg_el1(0, SYS_BRBCR);
> +}
Should flush branch record and use isb() before exit host kernel?
I see inconsistence between the function above and BRBE's disable
function. Here it clears E0BRE / ExBRE bits for disabling BRBE, but the
BRBE driver sets the PAUSED bit in BRBFCR_EL1 for disabling BRBE.
Thanks,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists