[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250213174109.GA126857@yaz-khff2.amd.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 12:41:09 -0500
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Khuong Dinh <khuong@...amperecomputing.com>,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: Use string choice helper functions
On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 10:52:21PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Remove hard-coded strings by using the str_enabled_disabled(),
> str_yes_no(), str_write_read(), and str_plural() helper functions.
>
> Add a space in "All DIMMs support ECC: yes/no" to improve readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
> ---
> drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> drivers/edac/debugfs.c | 5 ++++-
> drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/edac/i7300_edac.c | 7 +++---
> drivers/edac/xgene_edac.c | 17 +++++++-------
> 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
Please do include a base commit id. This patch doesn't apply to
ras/edac-for-next but does apply to mainline/master.
In any case, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Is there any effort to make folks aware of these helpers? Maybe an
addition to checkpatch (as a CHECK/suggestion)?
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists