[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mf0MMKB40gC1hJLwY1i1Bjj+aKKDfFN9sYUzG_Z5Hu1iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 19:36:38 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...libre.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm: Move for_each_if() to util_macros.h for wider use
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 7:25 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Other subsystem(s) may want to reuse the for_each_if() macro.
> Move it to util_macros.h to make it globally available.
>
> Suggested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Who would pick it up? Should I take it via the GPIO tree and provide
an immutable branch for the DRM tree?
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists