| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID:
<PH0PR11MB5611BA2FF8E8BDAB55436A6881FF2@PH0PR11MB5611.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 03:51:16 +0000
From: <Shravan.Chippa@...rochip.com>
To: <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <mchehab@...nel.org>, <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>, <Valentina.FernandezAlanis@...rochip.com>,
<Praveen.Kumar@...rochip.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3] media: i2c: imx334: Add support for 1280x720 & 640x480
resolutions
Hi Sakari,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 6:15 PM
> To: shravan Chippa - I35088 <Shravan.Chippa@...rochip.com>
> Cc: mchehab@...nel.org; kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com; linux-
> media@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Conor Dooley -
> M52691 <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>; Valentina Fernandez Alanis -
> M63239 <Valentina.FernandezAlanis@...rochip.com>; Praveen Kumar -
> I30718 <Praveen.Kumar@...rochip.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] media: i2c: imx334: Add support for 1280x720 &
> 640x480 resolutions
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> Hi Shravan,
>
> Apologies for the late review.
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:09:26AM +0530, shravan kumar wrote:
> > From: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@...rochip.com>
> >
> > Add support for 1280x720@30 and 640x480@30 resolutions optimized the
> > resolution arrays by added common register array
> >
> > Updated 1920x1080@30 resolution register array with common register
> > array
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@...rochip.com>
> > ---
> >
> > changelog:
> >
> > v2 -> v3
> > Removied blank lines reported by media CI robot
> >
> > v1 -> v2
> > Optimized the resolution arrays by added common register array
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c | 119
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c
> > index a544fc3df39c..58ad67dbb331 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c
> > @@ -167,8 +167,8 @@ static const s64 link_freq[] = {
> > IMX334_LINK_FREQ_445M,
> > };
> >
> > -/* Sensor mode registers for 1920x1080@...ps */ -static const struct
> > imx334_reg mode_1920x1080_regs[] = {
> > +/* Sensor common mode registers for 445M link frequency */ static
> > +const struct imx334_reg common_mode_regs_445m[] = {
> > {0x3000, 0x01},
> > {0x3018, 0x04},
> > {0x3030, 0xca},
> > @@ -176,26 +176,10 @@ static const struct imx334_reg
> mode_1920x1080_regs[] = {
> > {0x3032, 0x00},
> > {0x3034, 0x4c},
> > {0x3035, 0x04},
> > - {0x302c, 0xf0},
> > - {0x302d, 0x03},
> > - {0x302e, 0x80},
> > - {0x302f, 0x07},
> > - {0x3074, 0xcc},
> > - {0x3075, 0x02},
> > - {0x308e, 0xcd},
> > - {0x308f, 0x02},
> > - {0x3076, 0x38},
> > - {0x3077, 0x04},
> > - {0x3090, 0x38},
> > - {0x3091, 0x04},
> > - {0x3308, 0x38},
> > - {0x3309, 0x04},
> > - {0x30C6, 0x00},
> > + {0x30c6, 0x00},
> > {0x30c7, 0x00},
> > {0x30ce, 0x00},
> > {0x30cf, 0x00},
> > - {0x30d8, 0x18},
> > - {0x30d9, 0x0a},
> > {0x304c, 0x00},
> > {0x304e, 0x00},
> > {0x304f, 0x00},
> > @@ -210,7 +194,7 @@ static const struct imx334_reg
> mode_1920x1080_regs[] = {
> > {0x300d, 0x29},
> > {0x314c, 0x29},
> > {0x314d, 0x01},
> > - {0x315a, 0x06},
> > + {0x315a, 0x0a},
> > {0x3168, 0xa0},
> > {0x316a, 0x7e},
> > {0x319e, 0x02},
> > @@ -330,6 +314,66 @@ static const struct imx334_reg
> mode_1920x1080_regs[] = {
> > {0x3002, 0x00},
> > };
> >
> > +/* Sensor mode registers for 640x480@...ps */ static const struct
> > +imx334_reg mode_640x480_regs[] = {
> > + {0x302c, 0x70},
> > + {0x302d, 0x06},
> > + {0x302e, 0x80},
> > + {0x302f, 0x02},
> > + {0x3074, 0x48},
> > + {0x3075, 0x07},
> > + {0x308e, 0x49},
> > + {0x308f, 0x07},
> > + {0x3076, 0xe0},
> > + {0x3077, 0x01},
> > + {0x3090, 0xe0},
> > + {0x3091, 0x01},
> > + {0x3308, 0xe0},
> > + {0x3309, 0x01},
> > + {0x30d8, 0x30},
> > + {0x30d9, 0x0b},
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* Sensor mode registers for 1280x720@...ps */ static const struct
> > +imx334_reg mode_1280x720_regs[] = {
> > + {0x302c, 0x30},
> > + {0x302d, 0x05},
> > + {0x302e, 0x00},
> > + {0x302f, 0x05},
> > + {0x3074, 0x84},
> > + {0x3075, 0x03},
> > + {0x308e, 0x85},
> > + {0x308f, 0x03},
> > + {0x3076, 0xd0},
> > + {0x3077, 0x02},
> > + {0x3090, 0xd0},
> > + {0x3091, 0x02},
> > + {0x3308, 0xd0},
> > + {0x3309, 0x02},
> > + {0x30d8, 0x30},
> > + {0x30d9, 0x0b},
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* Sensor mode registers for 1920x1080@...ps */ static const struct
> > +imx334_reg mode_1920x1080_regs[] = {
> > + {0x302c, 0xf0},
> > + {0x302d, 0x03},
> > + {0x302e, 0x80},
> > + {0x302f, 0x07},
> > + {0x3074, 0xcc},
> > + {0x3075, 0x02},
> > + {0x308e, 0xcd},
> > + {0x308f, 0x02},
> > + {0x3076, 0x38},
> > + {0x3077, 0x04},
> > + {0x3090, 0x38},
> > + {0x3091, 0x04},
> > + {0x3308, 0x38},
> > + {0x3309, 0x04},
> > + {0x30d8, 0x18},
> > + {0x30d9, 0x0a},
> > +};
> > +
> > /* Sensor mode registers for 3840x2160@...ps */ static const struct
> > imx334_reg mode_3840x2160_regs[] = {
> > {0x3000, 0x01},
> > @@ -505,6 +549,32 @@ static const struct imx334_mode
> supported_modes[] = {
> > .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_1920x1080_regs),
> > .regs = mode_1920x1080_regs,
> > },
> > + }, {
> > + .width = 1280,
> > + .height = 720,
> > + .hblank = 2480,
> > + .vblank = 1170,
> > + .vblank_min = 45,
> > + .vblank_max = 132840,
> > + .pclk = 297000000,
> > + .link_freq_idx = 1,
> > + .reg_list = {
> > + .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_1280x720_regs),
> > + .regs = mode_1280x720_regs,
> > + },
> > + }, {
> > + .width = 640,
> > + .height = 480,
> > + .hblank = 2480,
> > + .vblank = 1170,
> > + .vblank_min = 45,
> > + .vblank_max = 132840,
> > + .pclk = 297000000,
> > + .link_freq_idx = 1,
> > + .reg_list = {
> > + .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_640x480_regs),
> > + .regs = mode_640x480_regs,
> > + },
> > },
> > };
> >
> > @@ -989,6 +1059,15 @@ static int imx334_start_streaming(struct imx334
> *imx334)
> > const struct imx334_reg_list *reg_list;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + if (link_freq[imx334->cur_mode->link_freq_idx] ==
> > + IMX334_LINK_FREQ_445M) {
>
> Could you add a struct field for the common registers and the length of the
> list, instead of referring to the link frequency index?
>
> It'd be nice to have the same split done to the other frequency as well.
All value validated with respect to one link frequency (LINK_FREQ_445M)
In this case i will try to get common register values for both link frequencies (819M and 445M).
Thanks,
Shravan
>
> > + ret = imx334_write_regs(imx334, common_mode_regs_445m,
> > + ARRAY_SIZE(common_mode_regs_445m));
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(imx334->dev, "fail to write common registers");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > /* Write sensor mode registers */
> > reg_list = &imx334->cur_mode->reg_list;
> > ret = imx334_write_regs(imx334, reg_list->regs,
>
> --
> Kind regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists