linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 11/17] cxl/pci: Change find_cxl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <67ae7d24bfedd_2d1e294b1@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:15:48 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	<nifan.cxl@...il.com>, <dave@...olabs.net>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
	<dave.jiang@...el.com>, <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
	<vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
	<oohall@...il.com>, <Benjamin.Cheatham@....com>, <rrichter@....com>,
	<nathan.fontenot@....com>, <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
	<lukas@...ner.de>, <ming.li@...omail.com>,
	<PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/17] cxl/pci: Change find_cxl_port() to non-static

Terry Bowman wrote:
> CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error support will be added in the future. This
> requires searching for a CXL PCIe Port device in the CXL topology as
> provided by find_cxl_port(). But, find_cxl_port() is defined static
> and as a result is not callable outside of this source file.
> 
> Update the find_cxl_port() declaration to be non-static.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/core.h | 2 ++
>  drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Looks ok, but this tiny patch has no justification by itself and should
be squashed with the first consumer.