[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250213072536.69986-1-lilingfeng3@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:25:36 +0800
From: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@...wei.com>
To: <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, <jlayton@...nel.org>, <neilb@...e.de>,
<okorniev@...hat.com>, <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, <tom@...pey.com>,
<linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, <houtao1@...wei.com>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
<yangerkun@...wei.com>, <lilingfeng@...weicloud.com>,
<lilingfeng3@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: put dl_stid if fail to queue dl_recall
Before calling nfsd4_run_cb to queue dl_recall to the callback_wq, we
increment the reference count of dl_stid.
We expect that after the corresponding work_struct is processed, the
reference count of dl_stid will be decremented through the callback
function nfsd4_cb_recall_release.
However, if the call to nfsd4_run_cb fails, the incremented reference
count of dl_stid will not be decremented correspondingly, leading to the
following nfs4_stid leak:
unreferenced object 0xffff88812067b578 (size 344):
comm "nfsd", pid 2761, jiffies 4295044002 (age 5541.241s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 6b 6b 6b 6b b8 02 c0 e2 81 88 ff ff ....kkkk........
00 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de .kkkkkkk.....N..
backtrace:
kmem_cache_alloc+0x4b9/0x700
nfsd4_process_open1+0x34/0x300
nfsd4_open+0x2d1/0x9d0
nfsd4_proc_compound+0x7a2/0xe30
nfsd_dispatch+0x241/0x3e0
svc_process_common+0x5d3/0xcc0
svc_process+0x2a3/0x320
nfsd+0x180/0x2e0
kthread+0x199/0x1d0
ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xffff8881499f4d28 (size 368):
comm "nfsd", pid 2761, jiffies 4295044005 (age 5541.239s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 30 4d 9f 49 81 88 ff ff ........0M.I....
30 4d 9f 49 81 88 ff ff 20 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 0M.I.... .......
backtrace:
kmem_cache_alloc+0x4b9/0x700
nfs4_alloc_stid+0x29/0x210
alloc_init_deleg+0x92/0x2e0
nfs4_set_delegation+0x284/0xc00
nfs4_open_delegation+0x216/0x3f0
nfsd4_process_open2+0x2b3/0xee0
nfsd4_open+0x770/0x9d0
nfsd4_proc_compound+0x7a2/0xe30
nfsd_dispatch+0x241/0x3e0
svc_process_common+0x5d3/0xcc0
svc_process+0x2a3/0x320
nfsd+0x180/0x2e0
kthread+0x199/0x1d0
ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
Fix it by checking the result of nfsd4_run_cb and call nfs4_put_stid if
fail to queue dl_recall.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@...wei.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 153eeea2c7c9..0ccb87be47b7 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -5414,6 +5414,7 @@ static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_recall_ops = {
static void nfsd_break_one_deleg(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
{
+ bool queued;
/*
* We're assuming the state code never drops its reference
* without first removing the lease. Since we're in this lease
@@ -5422,7 +5423,10 @@ static void nfsd_break_one_deleg(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
* we know it's safe to take a reference.
*/
refcount_inc(&dp->dl_stid.sc_count);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!nfsd4_run_cb(&dp->dl_recall));
+ queued = nfsd4_run_cb(&dp->dl_recall);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!queued);
+ if (!queued)
+ nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
}
/* Called from break_lease() with flc_lock held. */
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists