[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250213073646.14847-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:36:46 +0900
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <leitao@...ian.org>
CC: <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <horms@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...a.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <ushankar@...estorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: document return value of dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu()
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:47:24 -0800
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index d5ab9a4b318ea4926c200ef20dae01eaafa18c6b..0b3480a125fcaa6f036ddf219c29fa362ea0cb29 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1134,8 +1134,8 @@ int netdev_get_name(struct net *net, char *name, int ifindex)
> * The returned device has not had its ref count increased
> * and the caller must therefore be careful about locking
> *
> + * Return: pointer to the net_device, or NULL if not found
> */
I noticed here we still mention RTNL and it should be removed.
Could you update the comment like this to remove RTNL and fix
mis-aligned notes ?
---8<---
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index d5ab9a4b318e..c0d6017a3840 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1123,17 +1123,17 @@ int netdev_get_name(struct net *net, char *name, int ifindex)
}
/**
- * dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu - find a device by its hardware address
- * @net: the applicable net namespace
- * @type: media type of device
- * @ha: hardware address
+ * dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu - find a device by its hardware address
+ * @net: the applicable net namespace
+ * @type: media type of device
+ * @ha: hardware address
*
- * Search for an interface by MAC address. Returns NULL if the device
- * is not found or a pointer to the device.
- * The caller must hold RCU or RTNL.
- * The returned device has not had its ref count increased
- * and the caller must therefore be careful about locking
+ * Search for an interface by MAC address. The returned device has
+ * not had its ref count increased and the caller must therefore be
+ * careful about locking
*
+ * Context: The caller must hold RCU.
+ * Return: pointer to the net_device, or NULL if not found
*/
struct net_device *dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu(struct net *net, unsigned short type,
---8<---
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists