linux-kernel - [PATCH] test_xarray: fix failure in check_pause when CONFIG_XARRAY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250213163659.414309-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:36:59 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
To: willy@...radead.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	geert@...ux-m68k.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] test_xarray: fix failure in check_pause when CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI is not defined

In case CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI is not defined, xa_store_order can store a
multi-index entry but xas_for_each can't tell sbiling entry from valid
entry. So the check_pause failed when we store a multi-index entry and
wish xas_for_each can handle it normally. Avoid to store multi-index
entry when CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI is disabled to fix the failure.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
---
 lib/test_xarray.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_xarray.c b/lib/test_xarray.c
index 6932a26f4927..0e865bab4a10 100644
--- a/lib/test_xarray.c
+++ b/lib/test_xarray.c
@@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ static noinline void check_pause(struct xarray *xa)
 {
 	XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
 	void *entry;
-	unsigned int order;
+	int order;
 	unsigned long index = 1;
 	unsigned int count = 0;
 
@@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ static noinline void check_pause(struct xarray *xa)
 	xa_destroy(xa);
 
 	index = 0;
-	for (order = XA_CHUNK_SHIFT; order > 0; order--) {
+	for (order = order_limit - 1; order >= 0; order--) {
 		XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_order(xa, index, order,
 					xa_mk_index(index), GFP_KERNEL));
 		index += 1UL << order;
@@ -1462,24 +1462,25 @@ static noinline void check_pause(struct xarray *xa)
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
 		XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(index));
-		index += 1UL << (XA_CHUNK_SHIFT - count);
+		index += 1UL << (order_limit - count - 1);
 		count++;
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-	XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != XA_CHUNK_SHIFT);
+	XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != order_limit);
 
 	index = 0;
 	count = 0;
-	xas_set(&xas, XA_CHUNK_SIZE / 2 + 1);
+	/* test unaligned index */
+	xas_set(&xas, 1 % (1UL << (order_limit - 1)));
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
 		XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(index));
-		index += 1UL << (XA_CHUNK_SHIFT - count);
+		index += 1UL << (order_limit - count - 1);
 		count++;
 		xas_pause(&xas);
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-	XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != XA_CHUNK_SHIFT);
+	XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != order_limit);
 
 	xa_destroy(xa);
 
-- 
2.30.0