linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/2] blk-wbt: Cleanup a comment in wb_timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250213100611.209997-3-yizhou.tang@shopee.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:06:11 +0800
From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
To: yukuai1@...weicloud.com,
	axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] blk-wbt: Cleanup a comment in wb_timer_fn

From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>

The original comment contains a grammatical error. Rewrite it into a more
easily understandable sentence.

Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
---
 block/blk-wbt.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c
index 8b73c0c11aec..f1754d07f7e0 100644
--- a/block/blk-wbt.c
+++ b/block/blk-wbt.c
@@ -447,9 +447,9 @@ static void wb_timer_fn(struct blk_stat_callback *cb)
 		break;
 	case LAT_UNKNOWN_WRITES:
 		/*
-		 * We started a the center step, but don't have a valid
-		 * read/write sample, but we do have writes going on.
-		 * Allow step to go negative, to increase write perf.
+		 * We don't have a valid read/write sample, but we do have
+		 * writes going on. Allow step to go negative, to increase
+		 * write performance.
 		 */
 		scale_up(rwb);
 		break;
-- 
2.25.1