[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87seoijb5q.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:12:49 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86@...nel.org
Cc: hpa@...or.com, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo
<shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix
Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Gregory
Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, Sebastian Hesselbarth
<sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Atish Patra
<atishp@...shpatra.org>, Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>, Sunil V L
<sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev, Anup Patel
<apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] irqchip/riscv-imsic: Set irq_set_affinity for
IMSIC base
On Sun, Feb 09 2025 at 09:46, Anup Patel wrote:
> From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
>
> Instead of using imsic_irq_set_affinity() for leaf MSI domains,
> use imsic_irq_set_affinity() for the non-leaf IMSIC base domain
> and use irq_chip_set_affinity_parent() for leaf MSI domains.
This clearly lacks an explanation of the purpose/reason of this change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists