linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 24/24] perf: Make perf_pmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250213130704.GG28068@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 14:07:04 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, lucas.demarchi@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, willy@...radead.org, acme@...nel.org,
	namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
	alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
	irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
	kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 24/24] perf: Make perf_pmu_unregister() useable

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:29:21PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> On 05-Feb-25 3:51 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Previously it was only safe to call perf_pmu_unregister() if there
> > were no active events of that pmu around -- which was impossible to
> > guarantee since it races all sorts against perf_init_event().
> > 
> > Rework the whole thing by:
> > 
> >  - keeping track of all events for a given pmu
> > 
> >  - 'hiding' the pmu from perf_init_event()
> > 
> >  - waiting for the appropriate (s)rcu grace periods such that all
> >    prior references to the PMU will be completed
> > 
> >  - detaching all still existing events of that pmu (see first point)
> >    and moving them to a new REVOKED state.
> > 
> >  - actually freeing the pmu data.
> > 
> > Where notably the new REVOKED state must inhibit all event actions
> > from reaching code that wants to use event->pmu.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> 
> Another race between perf_event_init_task() failure path and
> perf_pmu_unregister():
> 
>         CPU 1                                          CPU 2
> 
>   perf_event_init_task()
>     perf_event_free_task()
>       perf_free_event(event1)
>       /* event1->refcount is 1 */
>                                                   perf_pmu_unregister()
>                                                     pmu_detach_events()
>                                                       pmu_get_event(pmu) /* Picks event1 */
>                                                         atomic_long_inc_not_zero(&event1->refcount) /* event1 */
>       /* event1->refcount became 2 (by CPU 2) */
>         free_event(event1)
>           WARN()

I've unified perf_event_free_task() and perf_event_exit_task(). This
makes both use perf_event_exit_event() and as such should no longer have
this free_event().