[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z69eue2dV37vw61v@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:18:17 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@...tlin.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Grégory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] regmap: irq: Add support for chips without
separate IRQ status
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 12:49:56PM +0100, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
> Some GPIO chips allow to rise an IRQ on GPIO level changes but do not
> provide an IRQ status for each separate line: only the current gpio
> level can be retrieved.
>
> Add support for these chips, emulating IRQ status by comparing GPIO
> levels with the levels during the previous interrupt.
Thanks, this will help to convert more drivers to regmap
(e.g., gpio-pca953x that seems use similar approach).
...
> +static irqreturn_t regmap_irq_thread(int irq, void *d)
> +{
> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *data = d;
> + const struct regmap_irq_chip *chip = data->chip;
> + struct regmap *map = data->map;
> + int ret, i;
unsigned int i;
?
> + bool handled = false;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + if (chip->handle_pre_irq)
> + chip->handle_pre_irq(chip->irq_drv_data);
> +
> + if (chip->runtime_pm) {
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(map->dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(map->dev, "IRQ thread failed to resume: %d\n",
> + ret);
Can be one line.
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = read_irq_data(data);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + if (chip->status_is_level) {
> + for (i = 0; i < data->chip->num_regs; i++) {
> + unsigned int val = data->status_buf[i];
> +
> + data->status_buf[i] ^= data->prev_status_buf[i];
> + data->prev_status_buf[i] = val;
> + }
> + }
...
> + for (i = 0; i < d->chip->num_regs; i++)
> + d->prev_status_buf[i] = d->status_buf[i];
Hmm... Wouldn't memcpy() suffice?
But okay, this seems to be not a hot path and the intention is clear.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists