[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z69oxhkUzTfJ6YKi@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 18:01:10 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>,
Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@...il.com>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] printf: convert self-test to KUnit
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 04:35:12PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2025-02-10 13:23:21, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > This is one of just 3 remaining "Test Module" kselftests (the others
> > being bitmap and scanf), the rest having been converted to KUnit.
> >
> > I tested this using:
> >
> > $ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 printf
> >
> > I have also sent out a series converting scanf[0].
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250204-scanf-kunit-convert-v3-0-386d7c3ee714@gmail.com/T/#u [0]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
>
> I have just quickly tested this before leaving for a week.
> And I am fine with the result.
Seems reasonable to me. But I want a consensus with Rasmus.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists