[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250214180157.10288-1-aha310510@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 03:01:57 +0900
From: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
brauner@...nel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
willy@...radead.org,
davidlohr.bueso@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ipc: fix to protect IPCS lookups using RCU instead of semaphore
In shm_destroy_orphaned(), we are not performing updates to the IPCS and are
only calling idr_for_each(), which can be protected by the RCU read-critical
section.
And if idr_for_each() is not protected by the RCU read-critical section,
then when radix_tree_node_free() is called to free the struct radix_tree_node
through call_rcu(), the node will be freed immediately, and when reading the
next node in radix_tree_for_each_slot(), the memory that has already been
freed may be read.
Therefore, I think it is appropriate to use RCU instead of semaphore to
protect it.
Fixes: d9a605e40b13 ("ipc: rename ids->rw_mutex")
Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
---
ipc/shm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/shm.c b/ipc/shm.c
index 99564c870084..8fd87c4e5dc8 100644
--- a/ipc/shm.c
+++ b/ipc/shm.c
@@ -430,10 +430,10 @@ static int shm_try_destroy_orphaned(int id, void *p, void *data)
void shm_destroy_orphaned(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
{
- down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rwsem);
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (shm_ids(ns).in_use)
idr_for_each(&shm_ids(ns).ipcs_idr, &shm_try_destroy_orphaned, ns);
- up_write(&shm_ids(ns).rwsem);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
/* Locking assumes this will only be called with task == current */
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists