[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6-wrVaVSiI9ZKkD@google.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 13:07:57 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>,
Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@...el.com>, Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>, Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@...cent.com>,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@...el.com>, Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests patch v6 08/18] x86: pmu: Fix cycles event
validation failure
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> +static void warm_up(void)
> +{
> + int i = 8;
> +
> + /*
> + * Since cycles event is always run as the first event, there would be
> + * a warm-up state to warm up the cache, it leads to the measured cycles
> + * value may exceed the pre-defined cycles upper boundary and cause
> + * false positive. To avoid this, introduce an warm-up state before
> + * the real verification.
> + */
> + while (i--)
> + loop();
Use a for-loop.
> +}
> +
> static void check_counters(void)
> {
> if (is_fep_available())
> check_emulated_instr();
>
> + warm_up();
> check_gp_counters();
> check_fixed_counters();
> check_rdpmc();
> --
> 2.40.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists