lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250214212425.84021-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:24:25 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Wentong Wu <wentong.wu@...el.com>,
	Jason Chen <jason.z.chen@...el.com>,
	Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mei: vsc: Use "wakeuphostint" when getting the host wakeup GPIO

The _CRS ACPI resources table has 2 entries for the host wakeup GPIO,
the first one being a regular GpioIo () resource while the second one
is a GpioInt () resource for the same pin.

The acpi_gpio_mapping table used by vsc-tp.c maps the first Gpio ()
resource to "wakeuphost-gpios" where as the second GpioInt () entry
is mapped to "wakeuphostint-gpios".

Using "wakeuphost" to request the GPIO as was done until now, means
that the gpiolib-acpi code does not know that the GPIO is active-low
as that info is only available in the GpioInt () entry.

Things were still working before due to the following happening:

1. Since the 2 entries point to the same pin they share a struct gpio_desc
2. The SPI core creates the SPI device vsc-tp.c binds to and calls
   acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(). This does use the second entry and sets
   FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW in gpio_desc.flags .
3. vsc_tp_probe() requests the "wakeuphost" GPIO and inherits the
   active-low flag set by acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get()

But there is a possible scenario where things do not work:

1. - 3. happen as above
4. After requesting the "wakeuphost" GPIO, the "resetfw" GPIO is requested
   next, but its USB GPIO controller is not available yet, so this call
   returns -EPROBE_DEFER.
5. The gpio_desc for "wakeuphost" is put() and during this the active-low
   flag is cleared from gpio_desc.flags .
6. Later on vsc_tp_probe() requests the "wakeuphost" GPIO again, but now it
   is not marked active-low.

The difference can also be seen in /sys/kernel/debug/gpio, which contains
the following line for this GPIO:

 gpio-535 (                    |wakeuphost          ) in  hi IRQ ACTIVE LOW

If the second scenario is hit the "ACTIVE LOW" at the end disappears and
things do not work.

Fix this by requesting the GPIO through the "wakeuphostint" mapping instead
which provides active-low info without relying on acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get()
pre-populating this info in the gpio_desc.

Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316918
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/misc/mei/vsc-tp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/vsc-tp.c b/drivers/misc/mei/vsc-tp.c
index 35d349fee769..7be1649b1972 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/mei/vsc-tp.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/mei/vsc-tp.c
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int vsc_tp_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	tp->wakeuphost = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "wakeuphost", GPIOD_IN);
+	tp->wakeuphost = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "wakeuphostint", GPIOD_IN);
 	if (IS_ERR(tp->wakeuphost))
 		return PTR_ERR(tp->wakeuphost);
 
-- 
2.48.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ