lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250214232342.5m3hveygqb2qafpp@jpoimboe>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:23:42 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>, Weinan Liu <wnliu@...gle.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, joe.lawrence@...hat.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel

On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:04:17PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> Hi Josh,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:34 AM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 09:51:41AM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> > > > Ignorant arm64 question: is the module's text further away from slab
> > > > memory than vmlinux text, thus requiring a different instruction (or
> > > > GOT/TOC) to access memory further away in the address space?
> > >
> > > It appears to me the module text is very close to vmlinux text:
> > >
> > > vmlinux: ffff8000800b4b68 T copy_process
> > > module: ffff80007b0f06d0 t copy_process [livepatch_always_inline_special_static]
> >
> > Hm... the only other thing I can think of is that the klp relas might be
> > wrong somewhere.  If you share patched.o and .ko files from the same
> > build I could take a look.
> 
> A tarball with these files is available here:
> 
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ONB1tC9oK-Z5ShmSXneqWLTjJgC5Xq-C/view?usp=drive_link

Poking around the arm64 module code, arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c
is looking at all the relocations in order to set up the PLT.  That also
needs to be done for klp relas, or are your patches already doing that?

-- 
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ