linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: add samsung,exynos990-spi compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250214-adventurous-earwig-of-perspective-b5cd91@krzk-bin>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:16:55 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Denzeel Oliva <wachiturroxd150@...il.com>
Cc: andi.shyti@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, 
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, 
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: add
 samsung,exynos990-spi compatible

On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 04:33:41AM +0000, Denzeel Oliva wrote:
> Add "samsung,exynos990-spi" dedicated compatible for the SPI controller
> on Exynos990 SoC. This ensures proper representation of the hardware
> in the device tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denzeel Oliva <wachiturroxd150@...il.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/samsung,spi.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof