linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 00/12] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+i-1C0MgGxRF0mDsXdTf00u5CZojQfA7rBtFGQXtnMo_UNb4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:54:25 +0100
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com, 
	nadav.amit@...il.com, thomas.lendacky@....com, kernel-team@...a.com, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jannh@...gle.com, 
	mhklinux@...look.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/12] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation

On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 at 10:36, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 03:02:40PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > Peter, do you prefer a v12, or should
> > additional small fixes and improvements
> > just be sent in follow-up patches at
> > this point?
>
> I think I'm mostly okay at this point, but DaveH was wanting to have a
> look at this thing. Dave did you get around to reading one of these
> recent versions, wdyt?

I was waiting until my nitpicks were resolved but if you merge it
before then, please add my:

Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>