lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVP+GBFMfd-C_7oiXHKSbycPv6adxJdM-Kt03+m9UqDiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 11:28:11 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, 
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, 
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, 
	Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, 
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, 
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>, Crt Mori <cmo@...exis.com>, 
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Jacky Huang <ychuang3@...oton.com>, 
	Shan-Chun Hung <schung@...oton.com>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, 
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...e.org>, 
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, 
	qat-linux@...el.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH treewide v2 1/3] bitfield: Add non-constant
 field_{prep,get}() helpers

Hi David,

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 at 20:03, David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 14:46:51 +0100
> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
> > The existing FIELD_{GET,PREP}() macros are limited to compile-time
> > constants.  However, it is very common to prepare or extract bitfield
> > elements where the bitfield mask is not a compile-time constant.
> >
> > To avoid this limitation, the AT91 clock driver and several other
> > drivers already have their own non-const field_{prep,get}() macros.
> > Make them available for general use by consolidating them in
> > <linux/bitfield.h>, and improve them slightly:
> >   1. Avoid evaluating macro parameters more than once,
> >   2. Replace "ffs() - 1" by "__ffs()",
> >   3. Support 64-bit use on 32-bit architectures.
> ...
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bitfield.h b/include/linux/bitfield.h
> > index 63928f1732230700..c62324a9fcc81241 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/bitfield.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bitfield.h
> > @@ -203,4 +203,38 @@ __MAKE_OP(64)
> >  #undef __MAKE_OP
> >  #undef ____MAKE_OP
> >
> > +/**
> > + * field_prep() - prepare a bitfield element
> > + * @_mask: shifted mask defining the field's length and position
> > + * @_val:  value to put in the field
> > + *
> > + * field_prep() masks and shifts up the value.  The result should be
> > + * combined with other fields of the bitfield using logical OR.
> > + * Unlike FIELD_PREP(), @_mask is not limited to a compile-time constant.
> > + */
> > +#define field_prep(_mask, _val)                                              \
>
> You don't need an _ prefix on the 'parameters' - it doesn't gain anything.

I just followed the style of all other macros in this file.
I can add a new patch converting the existing macros, though...

>
> > +     ({                                                              \
> > +             typeof(_mask) __mask = (_mask);                         \
>
> Use: __auto_type __mask = (_mask);

Likewise ;-)

> > +             unsigned int __shift = sizeof(_mask) <= 4 ?             \
> > +                                    __ffs(__mask) : __ffs64(__mask); \
> > +             (((typeof(_mask))(_val) << __shift) & (__mask));        \
>
> There are a lot of () in that line, perhaps:
>
>                 __auto_type(__mask) = (_mask);
>                 typeof (__mask) __val = (_val);
>                 unsigned int __shift = ...;
>
>                 (__val << __shift) & __mask;
>
> Note the typeof (__mask) - avoids line-length 'bloat' when the arguments are non-trivial.

OK, thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ